Did the work succeed?
Measures task completion, factual correctness, and whether the output meets the stated operating requirement.
Benchmarks are the public registry for how ALCUB3 evaluates runtime quality, trust boundaries, field signals, and failure modes before those claims become product or mission language.
Task success, tool correctness, memory continuity, and approval-path behavior.
Coverage, calibration, confidence, and source freshness for public-interest work.
Formal result tables publish as each benchmark clears review.
| Benchmark | Status | What it measures | Destination |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runtime inspection | In Review | Task trajectory quality, tool-call correctness, recovery, and approval-ready output. | Platform track |
| Control-plane failure modes | Evidence Gathering | Privilege routing, instruction conflict handling, privacy-aware coordination, and reliability under review. | Reports |
| Memory-backed continuity | Planned | How well workspace memory preserves useful context without leaking authority or stale assumptions. | Learning Hub |
| Water intelligence calibration | Planned | Coverage, regional fit, score-vs-ground-truth, and evidence-tier correctness. | Impact track |
Measures task completion, factual correctness, and whether the output meets the stated operating requirement.
Captures unnecessary steps, risky tool calls, prompt drift, missing escalation, and whether the reasoning path stayed legible.
Checks identity, permission, policy, approval, and recovery boundaries before calling the result production-ready.
Every benchmark references the method page that defines scoring, evidence tiers, and caveats.
Read methods →Benchmark results become reports when they produce a meaningful product, market, or mission conclusion.
Open reports →Benchmark logic becomes learning content when operators or builders need to use the pattern themselves.
Open Learning Hub →